Paul, Timothy and Wine for the Stomach

The Men’s dorm lounge was a place of spirited debate and passionate argumentation when I was in Bible College. The great thing about our discussions and debates was that our theological wits were being sharpened (I think). Hopefully this post, rather than dividing and stirring up strife will help all of us sharpen our wits on what we believe!

In 1 Timothy 5:23, Paul tells Timothy to drink wine for the sake of his stomach and his infirmities. Before I discuss whether or not this wine contained any fermentation, I would like to point out how this text relates to the practice of medicine. In the New Testament, there is talk of healing. Jesus healed people (Matt. 21:14), and so did the apostles (Acts 3:11). Paul himself healed people (Acts 28:8). Paul even talks about gift of healing (1 Cor.12:28). What are we to make of this? I believe we are faced with a couple of choices.

First, we can abandon the New Testament and say that the stories of healing in the Bible are pure myth. Naturalism teaches that all we can know of the world is the natural laws which we see and observe. Thus, because naturalism teaches us that miracle such as healing do not happen, we should not expect them to happen. Following Rudolf Bultmann’s lead, this position would cause us abandon the biblical text as it does not meet with naturalistic presuppositions. This “demythologizing” means there is no such thing as supernatural miracles of healing – because we know from science that such a thing could not happen. For the true believer, however, this approach is unacceptable. All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and it is true (2 Tim.3:16). There must be another explanation.

The other end of the spectrum is found in the modern signs and wonders movement. People like Benny Hinn, Kenneth Copeland and Kenneth Haggin believe that the work of the Holy Spirit is always accompanied by signs and wonders, which include healing. This too has lead to all kinds of excess.

Consider as a third option that although Paul who could heal, he did not always heal! Instead of healing Timothy, he prescribes wine for Timothy’s stomach ailments! I take from this that going to the doctor, seeking a prescription is valid for believers. I do not need to go to a healing service; I need to avail myself of medicinal treatments for my ailments. Now, I do not say we should not pray for physical health (James 5:16), there seems to be biblical precedent for that. But healing is not always in the will of God (2 Sam.12:22; 2 Tim.4:20).

Now for the controversy: Was Paul telling Timothy to drink non-alcoholic grape juice? Or did the wine that Paul refers to include alcohol? I believe there is good reason to believe that the wine that Paul was speaking to Timothy about contained alcohol. There are a couple of good reasons why Paul was not telling Timothy to drink grape juice.

First of all, according to this verse Timothy was abstaining from wine. He was drinking only water. Now, that begs the question, why would Timothy be abstaining from something with 0% alcohol? What good reason could there be for abstaining from grape juice? The wine Paul was recommending was the kind of wine Timothy was abstaining from! As a chronically sick individual, Paul was recommending a “little” wine as a way to help with his stomach ailments. Paul was in no way advocating the use of wine as a means to intoxication, but he was recommending Timothy use a “little” wine for the sake of his stomach.
The fact is, Timothy was abstaining from wine because he did not want to become intoxicated – something the scripture forbid (Prov.23:21, 29ff; 1 Cor.6:10; Eph.5:18). So, rather than tread dangerously close to intoxication, Timothy had decided to choose for himself a no-alcohol policy.

What Paul condones here is not drinking, but the medicinal use of wine. In fact, it appears Paul was generally accepting of Timothy’s position of abstinence on this issue. To me, this would indicate that Paul had no problem with someone who abstained from the use of wine (unlike many today who suggest that abstinence from wine is equivalent to legalism). The fact that Timothy did abstain – and the allowance to drink wine was only for the sake of its medicinal qualities would lead me to conclude that abstinence is a good idea.

If you want to argue that it’s okay to moderately drink from this passage – then your drinking can only be as a cure for stomach ailments and in this day of pharmaceuticals, there are likely far better cures for stomach ailments than a glass of wine (I recommend chicken noodle soup and ginger ale). I abstain from alcoholic beverages. I would encourage you to do the same. Not because I can argue that alcohol in the bible was never fermented, but because the example of Timothy would indicate this is a legitimate choice!

About these ads

5 thoughts on “Paul, Timothy and Wine for the Stomach

  1. Just a note…

    Last time I checked, Vicks NyQuil has a moderate dose of alcohol to help you sleep more deeply in spite of flu symptoms that would otherwise keep you awake and take away form the healing benefits of a good deep sleep.

    Not sure if that’s still the case.

    But makes for a good modern day example.

  2. This is an incredibly factual, well-analyzed and well-balanced article. There are many Christians who try to help the Bible by extending certain passages to what is obviously not in the Bible. Many Christians have said that the miracle in Cana, where the LORD turned water into wine, and Paul’s advise to Timothy to drink a little wine for his stomach, referred to non-fermented drinks. Some categorically say, grape juice. However, there is no evidence whatsoever to support such assertions. On the other hand, many others (many of them, non-Christians) have used those Bible incidents as excuses to become wine-abusers (drunkards.) My belief is that the Bible doesn’t forbid moderate use of alcohol and for medicinal purposes as long as it doesn’t lead to intoxication. I know that the meaning of the word “intoxication” can lead to a prolonged debate, but we’ll leave that debate for another day. Indeed, many modern medicine contain alcohol in them, but not enough to make one drunk. Having said that, I believe that the safest Christian attitude should be to abstain from alcohol consumption altogether (except when there is a special health benefit, as Paul was advising Timothy.) Avoidance is the best thing to do, since one exposes oneself to temptations and the risk of intoxication as it becomes easier to cross the line from sensible use to overuse or outright drunkenness.

  3. Wine was used to purify water (I Tim. 5:23). Often water would have a high alkaline content, and the pH could be neutralized somewhat by adding wine to the water. This was not the only method. Water could be made safe to drink by boiling, but that was time consuming and costly, since wood was scarce. The most common method of purifying water for drinking was to mix it with wine. Paul told Timothy to use no longer water, but to use wine for his stomach’s sake. (Note that Paul told Timothy to USE wine – not to drink it!) Timothy obviously had a stomach problem – due to poor water.

    When Paul said, “Drink no longer water,” was he telling Timothy to never drink water again? Should we conclude that Christians are to no longer drink water? Hardly. Paul was telling Timothy to stop using water exclusively. Evidently, this young man was so concerned about his testimony (that he NOT be associated with the winebibbers) that he stopped drinking wine altogether. For the sake of testimony and association, he stopped mixing wine into his water – and as a result, he developed stomach problems. Paul had to urge him to use a little wine to purify his water – so as to prevent his stomach pain caused by the poor quality of the water.

    This is the same kind of advice you would give a child, to put on a warm jacked when it’s cold or to not eat the mud-cakes. It is clear that Timothy was constantly getting healed since he was also constantly getting re-invected with what was in the water. So in order to aviod the whole thing Paul insctrucks him to take some wine with his water.

    If this has got to do with medacine then Paul is a dockter and so is every perant that cares to protect there children from the elements.

  4. Sometimes I have acid reflux which hurts my stomach and causes heartburn, nausea, and other ailments. I am tired throughout the day because I can’t sleep. So I use a well known home remedy, which is to swallow a teaspoon of Japanese rice vinegar (considered a wine), and I feel instant relief. Yes, a little bit of “wine” (just a teaspoon) will help. You can also use apple cider vinegar, plain vinegar, wine, or ginger ale. I believe Paul was directing Timothy to this well known home remedy so Timothy could get some relief from his “stomach problems and frequent illnesses”. It only takes a teaspoon though. Some people are prone to acid reflux and have the condition all their life, so knowing what to take really is a life saver. Helps them function each day and sleep at night. Taking Tums, medications, or restricting diet don’t really work because they don’t balance the pH level of stomach acid the way vinegar does.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s